Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Xeon E5-2690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3297 days newer than Xeon E5-2690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-2690 - 284 vs 255 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 65 vs 135 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 16 vs 12 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
284
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$196.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$196.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4947 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2690 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 135 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |