Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2381 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 441 vs 395 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
441
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$196.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$196.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5575 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |