Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Core i7-4910MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2612 days newer than Core i7-4910MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4910MQ - 188 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4910MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4910MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$196.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$196.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i7-4910MQ |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 20th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 47 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |