Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Core i5-10600KF on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 987 days newer than Core i5-10600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 125 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 32% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-10600KF - 785 vs 594 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
594
75.6687898089172%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$178.04
100%
Buy for CA$178.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75529 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1686
54.29951690821257%
Multi-Core
6819
31.232537901342006%
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |