Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-4130 - 125 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - CA$84.99 vs CA$246.41
- Up to 63% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-10600KF - CA$0.73 vs CA$1.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.97/FPS
37%
Price, CA$
CA$246.41
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$246.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
117
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$84.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |