Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-10105F - 136 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - CA$96.0 vs CA$222.88
- Up to 55% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10600KF - CA$0.73 vs CA$1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.64/FPS
44%
Price, CA$
CA$222.88
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$222.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19577 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19577 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |