Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 70% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-6300 - 403 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - CA$66.51 vs CA$167.65
- Up to 33% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-10600KF - CA$0.28 vs CA$0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
403
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.42/FPS
66%
Price, CA$
CA$167.65
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$167.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2190 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
237
58%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |