Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - CA$341.45 vs CA$860.89
- Up to 43% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i9-14900F - CA$1.47 vs CA$2.58 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 43% better in F1 23 than Core i5-10600 - 334 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600 - 32 vs 12 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
233
69%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$341.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$341.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
334
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.58/FPS
56%
Price, CA$
CA$860.89
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$860.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |