Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600 is 575 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 153 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 60% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$1.54 vs CA$3.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
153
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
FPS and Value Winner
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
150
98.0392156862745%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.83/FPS
40.2088772845953%
Price, CA$
CA$593.83
100%
Buy for CA$593.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |