Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1887 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 20% better in New World than Celeron 3205U - 115 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
115
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$157.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$157.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11313 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Celeron 3205U |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 15 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 15.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |