Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 1734 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - CA$174.99 vs CA$218.88
- Up to 19% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-6700K - CA$0.87 vs CA$1.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 0% better in Valheim than Core i5-10400 - 202 vs 201 FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
201
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$174.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$174.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3619 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
202
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.08/FPS
80%
Price, CA$
CA$218.88
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$218.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3619 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |