Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Core i5-10300H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 140 days older than Core i5-10300H.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10300H
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-10300H - 421 vs 413 FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
421
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$346.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$346.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10300H | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |