Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10300H outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10300H is 3263 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10300H
- Performs up to 7% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8120 - 293 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10300H | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |