Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9350KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9350KF is 330 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9350KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen 3 2200G - 242 vs 225 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i3-9350KF - CA$280.0 vs CA$463.02
- Up to 35% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i3-9350KF - CA$1.24 vs CA$1.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9350KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
242
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.91/FPS
64%
Price, CA$
CA$463.02
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$463.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13619 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
225
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$280
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13620 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9350KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |