Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 927 days newer than Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 10% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-9100T - 285 vs 260 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 16 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
285
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.39/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$395.78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$395.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2421 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
57.2584483579248%
Multi-Core
3178
36.1547212741752%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |