Buy on Amazon
CA$359
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 234 days newer than Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 7% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-9100T - 131 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-9700
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
131
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$359
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-9700 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.7 GHz LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for CA$359 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13931 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-9100T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Core i7-9700
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i3-9100T or Core i7-9700
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor, 1920 x 1080, Epic
17 FPS
CA$105.53/FPS
GeForce GTX 1050
Core i7-9700
16 GB, 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,793.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
