Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 682 days newer than Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 20% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-9100T - 402 vs 336 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 32 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
402
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1800
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,800 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4054 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
71.77804295942721%
Multi-Core
3178
25.726544159313526%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |