Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 450 days newer than Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 14% better in Diablo IV than Core i3-9100T - 193 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 64 vs 4 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
193
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$11.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$2200
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$2,200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
73.53300733496333%
Multi-Core
3178
22.68703597944032%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |