Buy on Amazon
CA$145
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2185 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6350 - 187 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 6 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
187
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$145
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W, BX80684I39100F
Buy for CA$145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
