Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 1584 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1840 - 158 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i3-9100 - CA$41.21 vs CA$160.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-9100 - CA$0.27 vs CA$1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
158
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.01/FPS
26%
Price, CA$
CA$160
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$160 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
150
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |