Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8350K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8350K is 565 days older than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i3-9100F - 152 vs 151 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i3-8350K - CA$138.88 vs CA$318.88
- Up to 56% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i3-8350K - CA$0.92 vs CA$2.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i3-8350K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
152
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.1/FPS
43%
Price, CA$
CA$318.88
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$318.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13785 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
151
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$138.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13785 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8350K | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |