Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i3-6320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2317 days newer than Core i3-6320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 4% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-6320 - 135 vs 130 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14067 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |