Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6100 is 961 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 7 2700 - 119 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$140.0 vs CA$280.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$1.18 vs CA$2.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$140
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |