Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1043 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-8320 - 232 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than FX-8320 - CA$59.99 vs CA$111.14
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74313 minutes ago
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74312 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |