Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 2553 days newer than Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-540 - 320 vs 316 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 35 vs 73 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-540
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 73 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
