Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 848 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3930T - 177 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |