Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1368 days newer than Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-4370 - 407 vs 406 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
407
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$368.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$368.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36746 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1220
98.62570735650768%
Multi-Core
2407
45.73437203116094%
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |