Buy on Amazon
CA$63.33
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7960X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7960X is 1461 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4330.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-7960X - CA$63.33 vs CA$709.99
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-7960X - 54 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7960X
- Performs up to 11% better in War Thunder than Core i3-4330 - 178 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4330 - 32 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Intel Core I3-4330 I3 4330 3.5 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread CPU Processor 4M 54W LGA 1150
Buy for CA$63.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75771 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-7960X X-Series 2.8 Ghz 16-Core Lga 2066 Processor 2.8 16 BX80673I97960X
Buy for CA$709.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75771 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i3-4330
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i9-7960X
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4330
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1066
77.47093023255815%
Multi-Core
2144
20.426829268292682%
Intel Core i3-4330 | vs | Intel Core i9-7960X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
