Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3781 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4330.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - CA$63.33 vs CA$853.06
- Up to 92% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-14900F - CA$0.24 vs CA$2.95 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than Core i3-4330 - 289 vs 268 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4330 - 32 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
268
92.73356401384083%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$63.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$63.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57742 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
289
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.95/FPS
8.135593220338983%
Price, CA$
CA$853.06
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$853.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57741 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1066
35.29801324503311%
Multi-Core
2144
11.735084838533115%
Intel Core i3-4330 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |