Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4330 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4330 is 91 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Performs up to 21% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1820 - 160 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-4330 - 53 vs 54 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i3-4330
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4330 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 54 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
