Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 232 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1820 - 178 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
