Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 1812 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-4160T - 155 vs 153 FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
155
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$133.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$133.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |