Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2805 days newer than Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 25% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-4150 - 391 vs 314 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
391
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |