Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1616 days newer than Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Core i3-4150 - 170 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 24 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
170
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$593.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$593.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
81.71114599686028%
Multi-Core
2047
27.46176549503622%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |