Buy on Amazon
CA$179.2
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $149
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2498 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3240T - 182 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 5 3400G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
182
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$179.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G 4-core, 8-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon RX Graphics
Buy for CA$179.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 5 3400G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i3-3240T or Ryzen 5 3400G
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, 1920 x 1080, Extreme
23 FPS
CA$76.2/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Ryzen 5 3400G
8 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,752.62
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
