Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2498 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-3240T - 183 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 12 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$460.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76687 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
27.22289890377588%
Multi-Core
971
13.87142857142857%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |