Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Core i3-3225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700X is 1641 days newer than Core i3-3225.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3225
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-3225 - 167 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3225 - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
167
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$130
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
540
49.63235294117647%
Multi-Core
1142
20.487979906709725%
Intel Core i3-3225 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |