Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i3-3225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3431 days newer than Core i3-3225.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3225
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 55 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 55% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-3225 - 222 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3225 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
222
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$102.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$102.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
540
24.269662921348313%
Multi-Core
1142
15.314469625854901%
Intel Core i3-3225 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |