Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - CA$69.88 vs CA$157.96
- Up to 54% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i7-6700T - CA$0.64 vs CA$1.39 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 4% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i3-3220 - 114 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
110
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$69.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$69.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13560 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
114
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.39/FPS
46%
Price, CA$
CA$157.96
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$157.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13561 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |