Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2038 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 20% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - CA$39.99 vs CA$49.99
- Up to 20% better value when playing World of Tanks than Celeron G4900 - CA$0.08 vs CA$0.1 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-3220 - 509 vs 506 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 54 vs 55 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
506
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
509
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.1/FPS
80%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |