Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2676 days newer than Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 19% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-3210 - 211 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 8 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
211
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$129.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$129.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |