Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Core i3-3120M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3383 days newer than Core i3-3120M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3120M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 45% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-3120M - 220 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3120M - 24 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
220
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.82/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$619.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$619.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15444 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3120M | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |