Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Core i3-3120M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 1961 days newer than Core i3-3120M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3120M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 26% better in War Thunder than Core i3-3120M - 160 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3120M - 8 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i3-3120M
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3120M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
