Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms Core i3-3120M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 23 days newer than Core i3-3120M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3120M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Core i3-3120M - 44 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3120M - 6 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
44
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.35/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3120M | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |