Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i3-2350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 2392 days newer than Core i3-2350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2350M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 47% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-2350M - 324 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2350M - 16 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
324
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$280
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2350M | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |