Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i3-2100 vs Celeron G3900

Core i3-2100 vs Celeron G3900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1654 days newer than Core i3-2100.

Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads

Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900

  • Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-2100 - 156 vs 154 FPS
  • Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-2100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
This is a free version of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra+

Intel Core i3-2100 Logo
Core i3-2100

Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011


FPS

154

98%

Value, CA$/FPS

Price, CA$

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


FPS

156

100%

Value, CA$/FPS

CA$0.43/FPS

100%

Price, CA$

CA$66.34

100%

FPS and Value Winner

INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80

Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 10 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra+

Intel Core i3-2100 Logo
Core i3-2100

Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i3-2100 Logo
Core i3-2100

Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011


Single-Core

466

80%

Multi-Core

954

96%

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


Single-Core

581

100%

Multi-Core

992

100%

Intel Core i3-2100 Logo

Intel Core i3-2100

vs
Intel Celeron G3900 Logo

Intel Celeron G3900

Feb 20th, 2011Release Date
Sep 1st, 2015
Core i3CollectionCeleron
Sandy BridgeCodenameSkylake
Intel Socket 1155SocketIntel Socket 1151
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores2
4
Threads2
3.1 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.8 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
65 WTDP
51 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
31.0x
Multiplier28.0x
Intel HD 2000Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 510
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.