Buy on Amazon
CA$21.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1002 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 3% better in New World than Celeron G1620 - 100 vs 97 FPS
- Up to 40% cheaper than Celeron G1620 - CA$21.99 vs CA$36.89
- Up to 42% better value when playing New World than Celeron G1620 - CA$0.22 vs CA$0.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 51 vs 55 Watts
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
100
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$21.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8 Processor - Affordable and Reliable
Buy for CA$21.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.