Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i9-9900T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1008 days newer than Core i9-9900T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 14% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-9900T - 122 vs 107 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 35 vs 58 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
122
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1433
64.40449438202248%
Multi-Core
5994
80.38085020785839%
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900T |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |