Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4209 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 51% better in Rust than Core i5-760 - 233 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 58 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - CA$41.21 vs CA$119.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Rust than Core i3-12100F - CA$0.27 vs CA$0.51 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
233
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.51/FPS
52%
Price, CA$
CA$119
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12478 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
154
66%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12478 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |