Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 344 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - CA$119.0 vs CA$312.4
- Up to 62% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-13400 - CA$0.26 vs CA$0.68 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-12100F - 458 vs 454 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
454
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$119
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
458
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.68/FPS
38%
Price, CA$
CA$312.4
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$312.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
58 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |